The content and information are based on my dissertation project on cultural policy history in Luxembourg in the 20th century.
General outline
Development of a theoretical framework for a historical approach to cultural policy.
Application of the theoretical framework to a history of cultural policy in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg from the 1920s to the 1970s. Focus on national cultural policy.
Inclusion of a case study, i.e. the National History and Art Museum (Musée national d’histoire et d’art, MNHA) in Luxembourg City. Analysis of the development of a national cultural institution through the lens of cultural policy.
Some researchers have already reflected on frameworks and models to analyse cultural policy (for instance the cultural policy researcher Geir Vestheim and his concept of an „overlapping zone“), but their approaches and frameworks are not suitable to a historiographic perspective, i.e. an analysis over a long period of time taking into account the general context.
In general, cultural policy is a public policy, which is also widely recognised in cultural policy research. Private actors (such as companies) do not carry our cultural policy, they can merely influence or contribute to it.
For a study on the evolution of cultural policy over a long period, historians need to consider three main elements: structures (administrative, legislative, political), actors (collective or individual; socio-cultural, political or economic) and discourses. These three elements shape cultural policy and are interrelated. Indeed, actors produce discourses, but are also act within structures. Furthermore, the national and international context can have an impact on cultural policy, as it is a highly contextual field.
The conception of such a framework also helps me to avoid the thorny issue of defining cultural policy in its content. Indeed, this would also entail the necessity to define culture: a concept that has a different meaning for every one of us, and that has changed over time, from Matthew Arnold’s very restricted definition in the 19th century (and still influential in the 20th century) to Unesco’s anthropological understanding such as defined in the Mexico Declaration on Cultural Policies (1982).
Vestheim, Geir. “Cultural Policy-Making: Negotiations in an Overlapping Zone between Culture, Politics and Money.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 18, no. 5 (2012): 530–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2012.708862.
Arnold, Matthew. Culture and Anarchy. Edited by Jane Garnett. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.